ROI Calculator · 60 seconds

How much is your current
way of working
actually costing you?

Twelve quick inputs. Five value drivers. Three numbers: your annual bleed, your saving with SoftSight, and the day cumulative savings cross the bundle subscription cost.

To your personalised number

60s

Time · CPI · Fraud · Headcount · Recon

5 drivers

No friction to see the numbers

No email

Inputs & results

Adjust the inputs. Watch the numbers move.

All defaults come from public benchmarks — ESOMAR, Insights Association, Cint/Lucid marketplace data, and operator interviews. Tune them to your reality.

A

Section A

Your team

Headcount, salary, and how many studies are running at once.

3 PMs

How many people on your team spend time on supplier coordination and fieldwork management.

$75,000
$40,000$120,000

Glassdoor/LinkedIn US median for MR PMs sits around $72K–$80K.

12 studies
1 study50 studies

Across the team, not per PM. Mid-ICP agencies typically run 10–18.

B

Section B

Your fieldwork operations

Supplier mix, RFQ volume, and the money flowing into sample.

6 suppliers
1 supplier20 suppliers

Mid-ICP agencies use 5–8 suppliers per study.

RFQ email events per study12 emails

Auto-calculated: outbound RFQ + inbound quote per supplier.

$500K
$50K$5M

Mid-size US agencies spend ~8–12% of revenue on sample.

$6.00
$2.00$25.00

Consumer studies $4–$8 · B2B/healthcare $15–$40.

C

Section C

Your quality experience

How often re-work happens, what it costs, and whether you're hiring.

Insights Association: ~25% of agencies report a significant quality event per quarter.

$15K
$2K$100K

Sample + PM time + client credits. Typical range $5K–$50K.

Hiring intent affects the headcount-avoidance value driver.

D

Section D

The reconciliation trap

When a supplier moves CPI mid-study, manual reconciliation often bills every respondent at the new rate. SoftSight tags each respondent at the rate they were sourced — the trap can't close.

30%
0%70%

Practitioners report 25–45% on portfolios with hard-to-reach quotas. Default = 30%.

20%
5%60%

Typically the last 10–30% of completes on an affected study. Default = 20%.

3.0×
1.1×6.0×

Range: 1.5× (modest uplift) to 5× (specialist panel premium). $5→$20 example = 4×. Default = 3×.

Your personalised numbers

Live calculation. Adjust the inputs at any time and watch the numbers move.

You're bleeding this every year

$790,500

You save this with SoftSight

$697,500

Payback period

36 days

Value driverBleedSaving
PM time$202,500$162,000
CPI overpayment$90,000$75,000
Fraud & re-field$150,000$112,500
Headcount avoidance$93,000$93,000
Reconciliation trap$255,000$255,000
Net subscription$68,400
Total$790,500$629,100
Book a 20-minute demo

Optional · PDF report

Email yourself a one-pager with your inputs and the full breakdown.

Benchmarks · ESOMAR, Insights Association, Cint/Lucid data

The five value drivers

Where the bleed actually
comes from.

Each value driver has its own formula, its own benchmark, and its own input field you can tune. The calculator adds them up live as you move the sliders.

Driver 1

PM time cost

Hours your project managers spend on supplier emails, negotiation, onboarding, monitoring, and reconciliation — multiplied by their fully-loaded salary cost. Almost always the largest line.

SoftSight removes ~80% of this manual time.

Driver 2

CPI overpayment

The gap between what agencies pay suppliers today and what data-driven negotiation would achieve. Benchmarked at 15–20% overpayment across the market.

Negotiation intelligence recovers ~15% of sample spend.

Driver 3

Fraud & re-field loss

Re-fields, partial re-fields, client credits, PM time spent firefighting bad data. Roughly one in four agencies absorbs a significant quality event per quarter.

SurveyGuard prevents ~75% of these events before they cost you.

Driver 4

Headcount avoidance

The PM hire that manual operations forces you to make as volume grows. The most emotional number on the page — it's a person you don't need to add.

Each SoftSight PM handles ~2.5× the studies of a manual PM.

Driver 5

Reconciliation trap

When a supplier moves CPI mid-study, manual reconciliation often bills every respondent at the new rate. The original-rate batch quietly gets re-billed at the new rate — a 290% overcharge on the example study.

Respondent-level rate tagging eliminates the trap. 100% structural fix.

Benchmarks

The multipliers we use. All of them.

Every constant in the calculator is listed here so you can pressure-test the model before you trust the output. We don’t hide the math — and we’d rather you adjust the inputs than the formula.

  • All numbers in USD
  • Defaults from public industry data
  • Conservatively biased — we’d rather under-promise
BenchmarkValue

PM manual ops time per study

Email 4.0 · Nego 2.5 · Onboard 1.5 · Monitor 3.0 · Recon 2.0

13.0 hrs

SoftSight time reduction

Conservative benchmark across pilot cohorts

80%

CPI overpayment vs. optimal

Practitioner estimate · gut-feel vs. data negotiation

18%

CPI saving with SoftSight

Conservative — negotiation engine, supplier benchmarking

15% of sample spend

Fraud prevention rate

Real-time entry screening + behavioural signals

75%

PM hiring + onboarding cost

Recruiting fee (~20% of salary) + 90-day ramp

$18,000

Mid-study CPI drift rate

Practitioner range 25–45% on portfolios with hard-to-reach quotas

30% of studies

Late-batch share when drift occurs

Typically the last 10–30% of completes on an affected study

20%

New CPI multiplier

Range 1.5× (modest) to 5× (specialist panel premium)

Manual reconciliation catch rate

Most PMs do not audit at respondent level — 85% of mis-billings pass

15%

SoftSight reconciliation elimination

Respondent-level rate tagging makes the trap structurally impossible

100%

Assumed bundle subscription

AIPM Scale ($4,500/mo) + SurveyGuard Protect ($1,500/mo) − 20% bundle discount = $5,700/mo

$68,400 / year
Methodology

The math, written out.

If you want to replicate the calculator in your own spreadsheet before believing it, here’s every formula.

  • Driver 1

    PM Time Saving

    ops_hrs_total × studies_per_year × (pm_salary ÷ 2,080) × num_pms

    ops_hrs_total = 13 hrs (sum of email, negotiation, onboarding, monitoring, reconciliation). studies_per_year = concurrent_studies × 12. Saving = bleed × 0.80.

  • Driver 2

    CPI Saving

    annual_sample_spend × 0.15

    Bleed line = sample_spend × 0.18 (overpayment rate). Saving = sample_spend × 0.15 (conservative recovery rate).

  • Driver 3

    Fraud & Re-field Saving

    annual_quality_events × event_cost × 0.75

    Bleed = events × cost. Saving applies the 75% prevention rate. Quality frequency option converts to events/year.

  • Driver 4

    Headcount Avoidance

    (hire_cost + pm_salary) × hiring_multiplier

    Multiplier: Yes = 1, Maybe = 0.5, No = 0. hire_cost = $18,000 (recruiting fee + 90-day ramp).

  • Driver 5

    Reconciliation Trap

    (sample_spend ÷ studies) × (new_cpi_mult − 1) × studies × drift_rate × (1 − 0.15)

    When a supplier moves CPI mid-study, manual reconciliation often bills every respondent at the new rate. studies = concurrent_studies × 12. drift_rate = share of studies where CPI changes mid-field. 15% manual catch rate assumed. SoftSight tags respondents at the rate they were sourced → 100% structural elimination.

  • Output

    Payback Period

    (annual_subscription ÷ annual_gross_saving) × 365

    Days from subscription start until cumulative savings exceed the assumed $68,400/year bundle subscription (AIPM Scale + SurveyGuard Protect, with the 20% bundle discount applied).

The number you just calculated · is your number

Now see what the
platform looks like.

Twenty minutes in your browser. The walkthrough is run by someone who has lived the workflow you’re trying to leave behind — not a salesperson reading from a deck.